Early 19th century researchers and historians
such as Thomas Carlyle exalted the ‘Great Man’ theory of leadership citing
history’s great and famous such as Julius Caesar, Napoleon and Abraham Lincoln
as representing natural leaders taking control in tumultuous times. These
leaders and managers of men did not have the benefit of modern management teachings
and in many cases, such as Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan, achieved their
leadership roles at an extraordinary young age. Critics of the Great Man Theory identified
that many of these leaders achieved these positions through their birth-right and
were subsequently influenced by social, educational and opportunistic factors. Undoubtedly
gender was a major factor in the progression of these early leaders and indeed,
the recent Ambition and Gender Work Report (2011
Institute of Leadership & Management Development) still finds that
nearly three quarters of Women believe that barriers to advancement still
exist.
Dolly & Friends '9 to 5' |
Early views on the achievements of leaders adopted
the ‘Trait Theory of Personality’ identifying the broad dispositions of a
person and the interaction of various unique traits of individuals. This
identification of the ‘human factor’ in management has continued throughout the
twentieth century with the development of management theories and studies from
the initial Classical writers on to the Contingency view where more emphasis of
human nature is taken. During the latter half of the last century, the role of
the manager has now become open to the ‘masses’ reducing both the gender and
class distinctions from where it originally evolved.
Nevertheless, there are people who excel in
their managerial role - ‘Management
All-Stars’ with a desire to manage. Many relate this desire to manage to an
early experience in life although clearly the trait of the person will dictate
how such an experience is exploited and although
nurtured and fine tuned during life due to surroundings and stimulus, the basic
traits are with you from birth. The Chess Grand Master, Bobby Fischer’s passion
for puzzles was combined with endless hours of studying and playing chess. Born
with this passion, Fischer became what he was and this was summed up by his
rival, Garry Kaspsrov as ‘an innate gift’
.
So
the answer to the question ‘Are managers born or made?’ - they
are made but the answer to the more pertinant question, are ‘good
managers born or made?’ ; the answer is, without doubt, born.
Condensed extract from Paper
presented by Daniel Staines
No comments:
Post a Comment