Was the abolition of the ACE ‘Scale Fees’ the catalyst
for the use of modern
design technology for Structural Engineers?
In comparison with the origins of the profession,
it would appear that the least experienced, and often unqualified engineers,
are undertaking designs
utilising computer software to solve complex problems leaving the more experienced
engineer to manage the business aspects of the company.
With the Governments’
initiative to introduce Building Information Modeling (BIM) throughout the
industry, are the days of the Chartered Engineer numbered?
Creative destruction, sometimes known as Schumpeter's Gale, describes the way in which new economic
development arises from the diminution of some prior economic order by a
reconfiguration of previous beliefs and systems. In 1987, the Office of Fair
Trading (OFT) banned the use of the ‘Scale Fees’ after they ruled they were
uncompetitive and did not reflect that computers and information technology
made engineers more competitive. The consequence of introducing competitive fee
bidding is estimated to have reduced the average consultancy fee by
approximately 50%. Subsequently, in order
to stay competitive and provide ‘added value’, there has been a need to provide
a service at a competitive cost but without compromise to the underlying
philosophy of the industry Institute's charters.
In 1818 the Institution of Civil Engineers was
founded in London and received a Royal Charter in 1828, formally recognising civil engineering
as a profession. Its charter defined civil engineering as:
‘the art of
directing the great sources of power in nature for the use and convenience of
man, as the means of production and of traffic in states, both for external and
internal trade, as applied in the construction of roads, bridges, aqueducts,
canals, river navigation and docks for internal intercourse and exchange, and
in the construction of ports, harbours, moles, breakwaters and lighthouses, and
in the art of navigation by artificial power for the purposes of commerce, and
in the construction and application of machinery, and in the drainage of cities
and towns.’
Much discussion is undertaken within the industry’s’ journals
and forums over concerns regarding the improper use of computers and in
particular their use by inexperienced staff with a recurring theme being “a
good computer program does not make a good engineer, only a good engineer should
use a good computer program”.
Should engineers protect themselves from the
belief that computers are the replacement of ACE Scale fees in respect of
economical benefits?
No comments:
Post a Comment